Sanjeev Kumar.
← AI in Practice
Style Union / AI-assisted fashion films

Style wasn't enough. The fabric had to be right.

We won the work on the promise of stylish films. Delivering them meant solving a less glamorous problem: whatever happened in the scene, the clothes still had to look like the clothes the client sold.

My part: I led strategy and creative direction, then worked with the team to turn one-off experiments into a repeatable production method.

2–3 daysPer film at the start
~1 a dayAfter the process settled
2–3 a dayOn some peak days
The films

Different films. The same product rule.

These seven films show the range of work made for Style Union. The harder part was keeping the clothing true to the product information while the ideas, scenes and formats changed.

01 / AirDryWomen’s skorts
02 / DressesUGC-style film
03 / AirDryMen’s running product film
More from the work
Women’s dresses / V5
Women’s dresses / V3
AirDry / Aerofuse
Re-Pants
The product check

A product reference for every film.

Product sheets gave the team a clear reference for the fabric, cut and visible details.

Two things to get right

Let the scene change. Don't change the clothes.

We were solving two briefs at once. The film needed energy; the product needed fidelity.

Creative freedom

The film

We could change the setting, pace, framing and story to make the work feel stylish.

  • Visual direction
  • Movement and editing
  • The opening hook
Non-negotiable

The garment

The product sheet held the details that could not drift while we made those creative choices.

  • Fabric and texture
  • Cut and colour
  • Visible product details
They met at the review.

The team checked the film against the product sheet, fixed mismatches and carried those fixes into the next film. That is how the pace improved.

What changed

The pace changed without dropping the product check.

At first, one film took two to three days. As the team refined the process, the regular pace became about one film a day, reaching two or three on some days.